Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545170›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Evaluation of the use versus nonuse of urinary catheterization during laparoscopic adnexal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Yujian Jia, Huisheng Ge, Liling Xiong, Lulu Wang, Jieru Peng, Ying Liu, Jie Yu, Jianmei Liao, Hui Wang, Xiaoqin Gan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yujian JiaDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Huisheng GeDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Liling XiongDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lulu WangDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jieru PengMedical Administrative Department, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jie YuDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jianmei LiaoDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoqin GanDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yonghong LinDepartment of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility and safety of performing gynecological single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery without urethral catheterization in a day surgery setting. A total of 153 patients with adnexal disease were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). All subjects performed single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery between March 2021 and July 2022 in a day surgery center. After completion of the baseline survey, participants were randomized into one of three groups. Participants were randomized into one of three groups: uncatheterized (n = 51), intermittent catheterized (n = 51), or indwelling catheterized (n = 51). The primary outcomes were the incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and microscopic hematuria, and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI), the incidence of urinary retention, the incidence of bladder injury, the time till first urination, the time till first ambulation, the time till first exhaust, the time till first feeding and Kolcaba comfort score. The incidence of postoperative LUTS in the uncatheterized group (17.65%) was lower than that in the intermittent catheterized group (52.94%) and the indwelling catheterized group (84.31%), and there was significant difference between the two catheterized groups (P < 0.001). In the patients without vaginal manipulation, the incidence of microscopic hematuria in the uncatheterized group (0%) was lower than that in the intermittent catheterized group (37.50%) and the indwelling catheterized group (38.89%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the first urination time, first ambulation time, first exhaust time, first feeding time, and comfort score among the three groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, no urinary retention, UTI and bladder injury were recorded in the three groups. Gynecological single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery without urinary catheter is safe and feasible in a day surgery ward, which can reduce the incidence of postoperative LUTS and microscopic hematuria.

Indexed as

Adnexal surgeryLower urinary tract symptomsMicroscopic hematuriaUrinary catheterization

Identifiers

PMID38545170
PMCPMC10965526
OpenAlexW4392883666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.