ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessment of estimated and measured resting metabolic rates in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in marathon runners with type 1 diabetes: an observational study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to compare the estimated and measured resting metabolic rates of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient clinical setting. Material and methods: Participants were categorized into three groups that included type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and individuals without diabetes. Bland-Altman analysis was used to identify the equation that most accurately predicted the measured resting metabolic rates. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting resting metabolic rates. Results: Resting metabolic rates was observed to be higher in subjects with type 2 diabetes compared to that of the other groups. There was a proportional bias between predicted and measured resting metabolic rates. Type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, male sex, body weight, waist circumference, and triglyceride level were factors that positively predicted resting metabolic rates, and age was a factor that negatively predicted it. Conclusions: Although there was a bias between estimated and measured RMR, the most accurate results were achieved with the Mifflin-St Jeor equation for women with type 1 diabetes, with the Owen equation for men with type 1 diabetes, with the Harris Benedict equation for women with type 2 diabetes, and with the Ikeda equation for men with type 2 diabetes as well as for women and men in the control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.