ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy and safety of adjuvant topical application of botanicals in the treatment of melasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Typha pollen extract inhibit melanogenesis via α-MSH/MC1R signaling pathway in B16 and melasma mouse model.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Anti-Tyrosinase and Radical Scavenging Activities of Selected Cassipourea Plants and Isolated 7-Methoxygeranin A: Traditional Use as Skin Lighteners.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical application of botanical (TAB) adjuvants in the treatment of melasma and provide evidence-based medical evidence for their clinical application. Methods: Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed, databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled clinical trials on TAB adjuvant treatment for melasma from inception to May 2023. The primary outcomes included clinical efficacy, adverse effects, recurrence rate, and melanin index. Subgroup analyses were performed using the Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) scores. Results: This study included 16 randomized trials with 1386 participants. Eligible trials demonstrated that topical phytomedicine adjuvant treatment for melasma increased clinical effectiveness (RR = 1.14, 95% CI (1.10, 1.19), Conclusion: TAB for melasma has a clear adjuvant clinical efficacy, a low recurrence rate, and does not cause serious adverse effects. An appropriate administration method may achieve better efficacy; however, this requires further verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.