ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Characterization of atypical T cells generated during
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Breathing new life into T-cell receptor-engineered T-cell therapy in solid tumors: enhancing strategies to expand the universality of precision therapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered T cell-based adoptive immunotherapies met promising success for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Nevertheless, major hurdles remain to be overcome regarding the management of relapses and the translation to solid tumor settings. Properties of T cell-based final product should be appropriately controlled to fine-tune the analysis of clinical trial results, to draw relevant conclusions, and finally to improve the efficacy of these immunotherapies. For this purpose, we addressed the existence of atypical T cell subsets and deciphered their phenotypic and functional features in an HPV16-E7 specific and MHC II-restricted transgenic-TCR-engineered T cell setting. To note, atypical T cell subsets include mismatched MHC/co-receptor CD8 or CD4 and miscommitted CD8+ or CD4+ T cells. We generated both mismatched and appropriately matched MHC II-restricted transgenic TCR on CD8 and CD4-expressing T cells, respectively. We established that CD4+ cultured T cells exhibited miscommitted phenotypic cytotoxic pattern and that both interleukin (IL)-2 or IL-7/IL-15 supplementation allowed for the development of this cytotoxic phenotype. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, transduced with HPV16-E7 specific transgenic TCR, demonstrated cytotoxic features after exposure to HPV-16 E7-derived antigen. Ultimately, the presence of such atypical T cells, either mismatched MHC II-restricted TCR/CD8+ T cells or cytotoxic CD4+ T cells, is likely to influence the fate of patient-infused T cell product and would need further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.