Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545092›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Efficacy and safety of phospholipid nanoparticles (VBI-S) in reversing intractable hypotension in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, open-label, repeated measures, phase 2a clinical pilot trial.

Cuthbert Simpkins, Michael Moncure, Heather Klepacz, Kristopher Roach, Sadia Benzaquen, Luis Diaz-Caballero, Jonathan Cohen, Daniel Haase, Mukesh Kumar, Harven DeShield and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04257136 (VBI-S for the Treatment of Hypotension in Hypovolemic Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04257136 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

VBI-S for the Treatment of Hypotension in Hypovolemic Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorVivacelle BioRan2020 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsSeptic Shock, Sepsis, HypovolemiaArmsVBI-S
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Vasopressor Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Cuthbert SimpkinsDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Michael MoncureDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Heather KlepaczDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Kristopher RoachDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dignity Health Medical Group, Chandler, AZ, USA.
Sadia BenzaquenDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luis Diaz-CaballeroDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan CohenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Adventist Healthcare Network, Rockville, MD, USA.
Daniel HaaseDepartment of Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mukesh KumarVivacelle Bio, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA.
Harven DeShieldVivacelle Bio, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA.
Anthony ManasiaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Juan RodriguezDepartment of Basic Sciences, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Prashanth AnamthathmakulaDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Nik HurtVivacelle Bio, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA.
Bhaswati MukherjeeSigmadelta Consultancy, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Krishna TalluriVivacelle Bio, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA.
Einstein Healthcare Network · USTruman Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · USAdventist HealthCare · USDignity Health · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USTata Consultancy Services (India) · INUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since the 1990's attempts to favorably modulate nitric oxide (NO) have been unsuccessful. We hypothesized that because NO is lipophilic it would preferentially localize into intravascularly infused hydrophobic nanoparticles, thereby reducing its bioavailability and adverse effects without inhibiting its production. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of a fluid comprised of hydrophobic phospholipid nanoparticles (VBI-S) that reversibly absorb NO in the treatment of hypotension of patients in severe septic shock. Methods: This is a multicentre, open-label, repeated measures, phase 2a clinical pilot trial done at six hospital centers in the USA. Patients in severe septic shock were enrolled after intravenous fluid therapy had failed to raise mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) to at least the generally accepted level of 65 mmHg, requiring the use of vasopressors. The primary endpoint of this study is the proportion of patients in whom MAP increased by at least 10 mmHg. VBI-S was administered intravenously to patients as boluses of 100 ml, 200 ml, 400 ml, and 800 ml at 999 ml/min until the blood pressure goal was reached after which the infusion was stopped, and the MAP was recorded. All patients who received any volume of VBI-S were included in the primary and safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04257136. Findings: Between February 17, 2020 and January 3, 2023, 20 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. In all 20 (100%) patients, the goal of increasing MAP by at least 10 mmHg using VBI-S was achieved (p = 0.0087, effect size = 0.654). Mean VBI-S volume required to meet the primary goal was 561.0 ± 372.3 ml. The goal of lowering vasopressor dose was also achieved (p = 0.0017). Within 48 h or less after VBI-S, there was a statistically significant improvement in oxygenation, serum creatinine, clotting variables, procalcitonin, lactic acid, and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. At 24 h and 48 h following administration of VBI-S, 12/15 (80%) and 9/12 (75%) patients developed hyperlipidemia, respectively. No severe adverse events of VBI-S were observed, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: These preliminary findings suggest the safety and efficacy of VBI-S in treating hypotension in patients with septic shock. However, a definitive mortality benefit cannot be demonstrated without a randomized controlled study. Funding: The Naval Medical Research Command-Naval Advanced Medical Development program via the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium.

Indexed as

HypotensionMultiple organ dysfunction syndromeNitric oxidePhospholipid nanoparticlesSepsis

Identifiers

PMID38545092
PMCPMC10965406
OpenAlexW4391329097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.