Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545085›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncology

Oestrogen Receptor Positive Metastatic Eccrine Porocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of Anti-Oestrogen Therapy in Rare Cancers.

Anita J M Kalakonda, Abhishek Mahajan, Shien Chow, Anna C Olsson-Brown, Joseph J Sacco

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. S1 guideline sweat gland carcinoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita J M KalakondaClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Abhishek MahajanClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Shien ChowClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Anna C Olsson-BrownClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Joseph J SaccoClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rare cancers, in aggregate, represent a significant burden of disease in oncology and remain therapeutically challenging to manage due to a lack of clinical trials. Eccrine porocarcinoma is a rare cutaneous sweat-gland malignancy for which there remains no standard approach to metastatic disease. Case Presentation: We describe a patient diagnosed with metastatic disease, confirmed on bone biopsy; pathological analysis further revealed this was oestrogen receptor positive. She was commenced on the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, and denosumab, and showed a significant clinical and radiological response on bone scan within 7 months. At the time of report, over 2 years since commencing letrozole, she remains well with no evidence of progression. Conclusion: Our experience adds to the literature suggesting anti-oestrogen therapy can have significant benefit in patients with ER-positive non-breast cancer and is in keeping with increasing interest in therapies agnostic to site of origin but guided by expression/mutation of oncogenic drivers.

Indexed as

Anti-oestrogen therapyAromatase inhibitorsCase reportEccrine porocarcinomaOestrogen receptor positive

Identifiers

PMID38545085
PMCPMC10972574
OpenAlexW4393236046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.