ArticleAdvanced functional materials2020
Understanding the in vivo Fate of Advanced Materials by Imaging.
Article in Advanced functional materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coordinated Two-Node Blockade of NF-κB and TGF-β/Smad Signaling Attenuates the Foreign Body Response to Prevent Capsular Contracture.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Carbon nanomaterials as carriers for the anti-cancer drug doxorubicin: a review on theoretical and experimental studies.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- X-Ray Visible Protein Scaffolds by Bulk Iodination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Deciphering albumin-directed drug delivery by imaging.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Strategies for Delivering Nanoparticles across Tumor Blood Vessels.Advanced functional materials · 2021Article
- Recent advances in construction of small molecule-based fluorophore-drug conjugates.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Engineered materials are ubiquitous in biomedical applications ranging from systemic drug delivery systems to orthopedic implants, and their actions unfold across multiple time- and length-scales. The efficacy and safety of biologics, nanomaterials, and macroscopic implants are all dictated by the same general principles of pharmacology as apply to small molecule drugs, comprising how the body affects materials (pharmacokinetics, PK) and conversely how materials affect the body (pharmacodynamics, PD). Imaging technologies play an increasingly insightful role in monitoring both of these processes, often simultaneously: translational macroscopic imaging modalities such as MRI and PET/CT offer whole-body quantitation of biodistribution and structural or molecular response, while ex vivo approaches and optical imaging via in vivo (intravital) microscopy reveal behaviors at subcellular resolution. In this review, the authors survey developments in imaging the in situ behavior of systemically and locally administered materials, with a particular focus on using microscopy to understand transport, target engagement, and downstream host responses at a single-cell level. The themes of microenvironmental influence, controlled drug release, on-target molecular action, and immune response, especially as mediated by macrophages and other myeloid cells are examined. Finally, the future directions of how new imaging technologies may propel efficient clinical translation of next-generation therapeutics and medical devices are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.