ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Nomogram incorporating preoperative MRI-VASARI features for differentiating intracranial extraventricular ependymoma from glioblastoma.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and challenges in application of VASARI features in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Clinical and VASARI Features to PredictAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Building a dynamic web calculator for individualized conditional survival estimation in brainstem ependymoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preoperative MR - based model for predicting prognosis in patients with intracranial extraventricular ependymoma.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a robust MRI-based nomogram incorporating radiomics and deep features for preoperative glioma grading: a multi-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based nomogram for distinguishing between supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma and supratentorial glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial extraventricular ependymoma (IEE) and glioblastoma (GBM) may have similar imaging findings but different prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images (VASARI) features for preoperatively differentiating IEE from GBM. Methods: The clinical data and the MRI-VASARI features of patients with confirmed IEE (n=114) and confirmed GBM (n=258) in a multicenter cohort were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive models for differentiating IEE from GBM were built using a multivariate logistic regression method. A nomogram was generated and the performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Results: The predictors identified in this study consisted of six VASARI features and four clinical features. Compared with the individual models, the combined model incorporating clinical and VASARI features had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value [training set: 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.00; validation set: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00] in comparison to the clinical model. The nomogram was well calibrated with significant clinical benefit according to the calibration curve and decision curve analyses. Conclusions: The nomogram combining clinical and MRI-VASARI characteristics was robust for differentiating IEE from GBM preoperatively and may potentially assist in diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.