Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545051›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Deep learning-based partial volume correction in standard and low-dose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging.

Mohammad-Saber Azimi, Alireza Kamali-Asl, Mohammad-Reza Ay, Navid Zeraatkar, Mahboubeh-Sadat Hosseini, Amirhossein Sanaat, Habibollah Dadgar, Hossein Arabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimizing acquisition time and injected dose inBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad-Saber AzimiDepartment of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8037-3071
Alireza Kamali-AslDepartment of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-0589
Mohammad-Reza AyResearch Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Navid ZeraatkarSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-4753
Mahboubeh-Sadat HosseiniDepartment of Medical Radiation Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein SanaatDivision of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-2060
Habibollah DadgarCancer Research Center, Razavi Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6526-0960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging encounters the obstacle of partial volume effects, arising from its limited intrinsic resolution, giving rise to (I) considerable bias, particularly for structures comparable in size to the point spread function (PSF) of the system; and (II) blurred image edges and blending of textures along the borders. We set out to build a deep learning-based framework for predicting partial volume corrected full-dose (FD + PVC) images from either standard or low-dose (LD) PET images without requiring any anatomical data in order to provide a joint solution for partial volume correction and de-noise LD PET images. Methods: We trained a modified encoder-decoder U-Net network with standard of care or LD PET images as the input and FD + PVC images by six different PVC methods as the target. These six PVC approaches include geometric transfer matrix (GTM), multi-target correction (MTC), region-based voxel-wise correction (RBV), iterative Yang (IY), reblurred Van-Cittert (RVC), and Richardson-Lucy (RL). The proposed models were evaluated using standard criteria, such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), relative bias, and absolute relative bias. Results: Different levels of error were observed for these partial volume correction methods, which were relatively smaller for GTM with a SSIM of 0.63 for LD and 0.29 for FD, IY with an SSIM of 0.63 for LD and 0.67 for FD, RBV with an SSIM of 0.57 for LD and 0.65 for FD, and RVC with an SSIM of 0.89 for LD and 0.94 for FD PVC approaches. However, large quantitative errors were observed for multi-target MTC with an RMSE of 2.71 for LD and 2.45 for FD and RL with an RMSE of 5 for LD and 3.27 for FD PVC approaches. Conclusions: We found that the proposed framework could effectively perform joint de-noising and partial volume correction for PET images with LD and FD input PET data (LD

Indexed as

deep learningimage quality improvementpartial volume correction (PVC)Positron emission tomography (PET)U-Net

Identifiers

PMID38545051
PMCPMC10963814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.