Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544993›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Comparison of InterTAN and PFNA internal fixation for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture: A retrospective cohort study.

Li Li, Xing Fang, Jie Gao, Weizhen Han, Xiangan Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiLi Li, Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, 246 Heping Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230011, P.R. China.
Xing FangXing Fang, Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, 246 Heping Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230011, P.R. China.
Jie GaoJie Gao, Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, 246 Heping Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230011, P.R. China.
Weizhen HanWeizhen Han, Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, 246 Heping Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230011, P.R. China.
Xiangan KongXiangan Kong, Department of Orthopedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, 246 Heping Road, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230011, P.R. China.
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of InterTAN nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 151 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated in The Second People's Hospital of Hefei from October 2019 to December 2021. Among them, 73 patients had undergone InterTAN (InterTAN group) and 78 patients had undergone PFNA (PFNA group) internal fixation. Operation-related variables (operation time, incision length, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospital stays length, and fracture healing time), complications, and Harris scores were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time and incision length were shorter and the intraoperative bleeding was less in the PFNA group than in the InterTAN group (all Conclusions: InterTAN and PFNA internal fixation have their own advantages in treating patients with intertrochanteric fractures. InterTAN has better postoperative recovery results, while PFNA has less perioperative trauma. Clinically, InterTAN or PFNA should be selected based on the specific conditions of each patient to maximize the therapeutic benefit of each treatment method.

Indexed as

Internal fixationInterTANIntertrochanteric fractureProximal femoral nail antirotationThe elderly

Identifiers

PMID38544993
PMCPMC10963956
OpenAlexW4391507059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.