Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544973›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2024

Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of the Cochlear Osia System and Baha Attract System in Patients with Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness.

Matthias Brunner, Manjula Schou, Robert J Briggs, Dell Kingsford Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical Approaches and Complications in OSIA: a Systematic Review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Osia System to Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices in Sweden.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias BrunnerCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; mbrunner@cochlear.com (M.B.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7200-2458
Manjula SchouCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; mbrunner@cochlear.com (M.B.).
Robert J BriggsDepartments of Surgery and Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Dell Kingsford SmithCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; mbrunner@cochlear.com (M.B.).
Cochlear (Australia) · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-utility of the active transcutaneous Osia

Indexed as

clinical effectivenesscomparativecost-effectivenesshearing lossOsia System

Identifiers

PMID38544973
PMCPMC10971051
OpenAlexW4392518219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.