Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544905›Full record

ArticleAccounts of materials research2024

Progress in the Synthesis of Colloidal Machines.

Nicolle S Jackson, Samira Munkaila, Lasya Damaraju, Marcus Weck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of materials research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolle S JacksonMolecular Design Institute and Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.
Samira MunkailaMolecular Design Institute and Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.
Lasya DamarajuMolecular Design Institute and Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.
Marcus WeckMolecular Design Institute and Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-4268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past decade, the field of colloidal science has expanded the collection of colloidal particles to include an entire library of subunits that can be isotropic or anisotropic in terms of structural morphology or chemical composition. Using anisotropic subunits, the field has assembled a variety of static and dynamic structures. For this Account, we use the umbrella term "dynamic colloids" to describe subunits capable of movement, shape-shifting, or any other type of action in response to a stimulus and "static colloids" to describe those that are unresponsive to such stimuli. We view dynamic colloids as an access point to colloidal machines, a unique and emerging subfield of machines, and colloidal science. The assembly of dynamic subunits into colloidal machines differs from traditional self-assembly only in the final structures assembled, not the methods used. Dynamic assemblies have the capacity to interact with their environment in ways that traditional anisotropic self-assemblies do not. Here, we present the current state of the field of colloidal science toward the introduction of the next wave of colloidal machines. Machines are ubiquitous in nature and synthetic systems, governing every aspect of life. In mechanics, a machine is a device that transmits or modifies force or motion. In biology, nature's machines such as kinesin or ATP synthetase are essential to life. In the synthetic realm, molecular machines and nanomachines, recognized with the Nobel prize, include diverse systems, such as molecular rotors and elevators fabricated using bottom-up synthetic methods. On the microscale, microscopic motors based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMs) have been achieved via top-down methods such as micromachining. On the colloidal scale, machines are conspicuously absent due, in part, to the difficulty in navigating combinatory design spaces. We view colloidal machines (100 nm to 10 μm) as the next line of miniaturization in machines. Due to the bottom-up fabrication methods generally used in creating dynamic colloids, one can achieve complexity at a smaller scale than possible with top-down approaches. The introduction of colloidal scale machines would bridge the gap between the microscopic world with its macroscopic counterparts, the nanoworld with its molecular machines, and the biological world with nature's machinery. Reported colloidal machines to date are apparatuses that consist of multiple components of a single composition of dynamic subunits that come together to perform some work. The next step toward complex colloidal machines is systems containing

Identifiers

PMID38544905
PMCPMC10964234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.