ReviewCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2024
Advances in Fetal Cardiac Imaging and Intervention.
Review in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal management of a complicated pulmonary valve stenosis: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Navigating women with congenital heart disease during pregnancy: Management strategies and future directions.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Intrauterine Diagnosis and Treatment of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block: A Case Series and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- An anatomically informed computational fluid dynamics modeling approach for quantifying hemodynamics in the developing heart.PloS one · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Ultrasound for Physical and Virtual Fetal Heart Models: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The New Frontiers of Fetal Imaging: MRI Insights into Cardiovascular and Thoracic Structures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of fetal cardiology has evolved significantly in recent years. This review focuses on specific advances in fetal cardiac imaging and intervention that are increasingly used in clinical practice. On the imaging frontier, updated screening guidelines and artificial intelligence hold promise for improving prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. Advances in ultrasound technology and magnetic resonance imaging techniques have enabled greater diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of fetal heart disease from the first to third trimesters, and maternal hyperoxygenation can offer additional physiological insights. Fetal cardiac therapy has also seen great progress, with advances in transplacental pharmacologic treatments, infusions of enzyme replacement therapy, and fetal surgery for select rare and severe conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.