Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

State of perinatal mental health care in the WHO region of Europe: a scoping review.

Anna Horakova, Hana Nemcova, Kristyna Hrdlickova, Stefani Kalli, Alina Davletova, Mario Filipe Rodrigues Saraiva Duarte, Darya Molodina, Tiina Riekki, Antonin Sebela

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists versus guidelines: A European perspective.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna HorakovaCentre of Perinatal Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
Hana NemcovaCentre of Perinatal Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
Kristyna HrdlickovaCentre of Perinatal Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
Stefani KalliFirst Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Alina DavletovaFirst Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Mario Filipe Rodrigues Saraiva DuarteThird Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Darya MolodinaThird Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Tiina RiekkiResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Pohde, Finland.
Antonin SebelaCentre of Perinatal Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although perinatal mental disorders are the most common health complication among women in the perinatal period, there is a huge gap in the implementation of related research findings in the health care system. We mapped the state of perinatal mental health (PMH) care in the WHO Europe region with aim to identify leading countries, which can serve as models for countries with less developed perinatal mental health care. Methods: Guidelines, policies, and documents related to screening and treatment services for PMH were searched as grey literature. Results were analysed to assess the status of PMH care in the WHO European countries and to identify gaps (absence of relevant service or documents). The state of perinatal mental health care was scored on a 0-5 scale. Results: The grey literature search resulted in a total of 361 websites. Seven countries (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Malta) received full points for the presence of relevant PMH services or documents, while five countries received zero points. Most WHO European countries (48/53) have general mental health policies, but only 25 countries have policies specifically on perinatal mental health. Ten countries offer PMH screening, and 11 countries offer PMH service (of any type). Any PMH guidelines were provided in 23/53 countries. Conclusions: Perinatal mental health care is in its infancy in most WHO European countries. Leading countries (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Malta) in PMH care can serve as conceptual models for those less developed and geopolitically close.

Indexed as

guidelinesmental health policyperinatal mental disordersperinatal mental health careperinatal mental health care modelscreeningtreatmentWHO Europe region

Identifiers

PMID38544852
PMCPMC10965802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.