ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Predictive value of ultrasonic artificial intelligence in placental characteristics of early pregnancy for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Sonographic Markers of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review of Placental, Fetal and Uterine Artery Findings.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- ANGPTL4 in gestational diabetes: a diagnostic biomarker linked to placental senescence.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- From light to sound: Seeing and hearing the placenta in health and disease.Science advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: a systematic review of machine learning models and clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the predictive value of placental features in early pregnancy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using deep and radiomics-based machine learning (ML) applied to ultrasound imaging (USI), and to develop a nomogram in conjunction with clinical features. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 415 pregnant women at 11-13 weeks of gestation from two institutions: the discovery group from center 1 (n=305, control group n=166, GDM group n=139), and the independent validation cohort (n=110, control group n=57, GDM group n=53) from center 2. The 2D USI underwent pre-processed involving normalization and resampling. Subsequently, the study performed screening of radiomics features with Person correlation and mutual information methods. An RBF-SVM model based on radiomics features was constructed using the five-fold cross-validation method. Resnet-50 as the backbone network was employed to learn the region of interest and constructed a deep convolutional neural network (DLCNN) from scratch learning. Clinical variables were screened using one-way logistic regression, with P<0.05 being the threshold for statistical significance, and included in the construction of the clinical model. Nomogram was built based on ML model, DLCNN and clinical models. The performance of nomogram was assessed by calibration curves, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The AUCs for the ML model in the discovery cohort and independent validation cohort were 0.91 (0.88-0.94) and 0.86 (0.79-0.93), respectively. And 0.65 (0.59-0.71), 0.69 (0.59-0.79) for the DLCNN, 0.66 (0.59-0.72), 0.66 (0.55-0.76) for the clinical model, respectively. The nomogram exhibited the highest performance with AUCs of 0.93 (0.90-0.95) and 0.88 (0.81-0.94) The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) proved the superiority of the nomogram of clinical utility, and calibration curve showed the goodness of fit of the model. The DCA curve indicated that the nomogram outperformed other models in terms of net patient benefit. Conclusions: The study emphasized the intrinsic relationship between early pregnancy placental USI and the development of GDM. The use of nomogram holds potential for clinical applications in predicting the development of GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.