ArticleCureus2024
Immediate Implants in Posterior Extraction Sites: A Case Series Applying the Dual-Zone Therapeutic Concept With a Three-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant tissues in immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to present 11 immediately placed implants in posterior extraction sockets applying the dual-zone therapeutic concept. Five patients with non-restorable molars or premolars were treated with single or multiple immediate implants after atraumatic tooth extraction using a piezotome. The dual-zone therapeutic concept included grafting the jumping gap adjacent to the implant up to the gingival margin with a bovine xenograft. A screw-retained customized healing abutment was used to allow healing, and the implant loading was delayed for four to six months. All the patients were followed up for three years. Surgical complications, implant or prosthesis loss, and peri-implant marginal tissue health were assessed annually. No surgical complications or implant loss were observed during the follow-up visits. Peri-implant marginal tissue health showed excellent results with minimal marginal bone loss. Bone gain was evident in some cases. Using the dual-zone therapeutic concept with immediate implant placement in posterior extraction sockets showed promising results over three years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.