ArticleCureus2024
Retroperitoneal Chyloma: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal chyloma is a rare entity that presents with non-specific symptoms. Although benign, it can cause complications due to the mass effect. In this case report, we present the case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with a complaint of left-sided colicky abdominal pain and mild dysuria for one year. On physical examination, there was only mild abdominal tenderness. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a thick-walled cystic retroperitoneal mass with a small amount of fat in the superior part and a displaced left hydronephrotic kidney. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the findings and also revealed a fat-fluid level in the cyst. A laparotomy was performed, and the cystic mass, containing milky fluid, was excised. Histopathology showed a pseudocyst with chronic inflammation and a xanthomatous reaction, with no evidence of infection or malignancy. The patient recovered without complications and has not had a recurrence so far. Retroperitoneal chyloma is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. A definitive diagnosis is usually made only after surgery and a histopathological examination. The treatment of choice is a complete excision. Other approaches, such as marsupialization or drainage, will likely result in a recurrence. However, surgery in the retroperitoneal space is associated with a risk of injury to major vessels or organs. In conclusion, retroperitoneal chyloma is a rare entity that is best treated by complete excision. For small lesions, a wait-and-watch approach may be advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.