ArticleCureus2024
Epidemiology and Incidence of Upper Limb Fractures: A UK Level 1 Trauma Center Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of proximal ulna morphology: a systematic review of varus angulation of the proximal ulna.JSES international · 2026Review
- Major Upper-Extremity Fractures in Older Adults: Predictors of 5-Year Mortality.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Reassessing the Necessity of Group and Save Testing in Ambulatory Orthopedic Peripheral Limb Trauma Surgery.Cureus · 2025Article
- Postoperative Outcomes of Anteromedial Approach in Patients with Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes following intramedullary nailing of humerus fractures: a systematic review.JSES international · 2025Review
- Gunshot Trauma Patients Have Higher Risk of PTSD Compared With Blunt Trauma and Elective Populations: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outpatient Orthopaedic Care.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Understanding the incidence and epidemiology can inform clinicians and policymakers about the population's needs. Our study reports on upper limb fractures treated at a major trauma center over 7.5 years. Methods We collected data on fracture locations, age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI), and treatment options of all upper limb fractures treated at a Level I Trauma Centre from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2022. Humerus, radius, and ulna fractures were each classified as proximal, diaphyseal, and distal. Results About 9,915 patients sustained 12,790 fractures, given an overall incidence of 303.2 fractures per 100,000 patients per year. The most common fracture site was the distal radius (60.1 fractures per 100,000 patients per year, whereas carpal and metacarpal bones had the lowest incidence. The mean age and CCI were 46.4 years and 1.54, respectively. 58.1% of patients were male. All bone fractures distal to the elbow were associated with an age younger than the mean (all p<0.001), with humerus fracture patients having the oldest mean age (54.6 years). Compared to the mean gender ratio, except for ulna (no association), humerus (55% female), and radius (51% female), all other locations showed significantly higher incidences of males (all p<0.001). When plotting the incidence based on the age of injury, the entire cohort, along with radius and ulna fracture subgroups, demonstrated a bi-peak distribution. This pattern revealed that younger males and older postmenopausal females had the highest incidence rates. Conclusion To our knowledge, this represents the first study of this type in the UK since 2006. We sought to elucidate relative incidence and demographic associations with fractures to highlight changing population needs and allow policymakers and services at a regional and national level to operate with up-to-date information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.