Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544559›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2024

Associations of recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with age, body mass index, modic change, disc degeneration and sacral slope: A quantitative review.

Jinlong Zhao, Lingfeng Zeng, Shuai Zhao, Guihong Liang, Bangxin Sha, Haoyang Fu, Weiyi Yang, Jun Liu, Yuping Zeng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinlong ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, P.R. China.
Lingfeng ZengDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, P.R. China.
Shuai ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, P.R. China.
Guihong LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, P.R. China.
Bangxin ShaDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Second Chinese Medicine Hospital (Guangdong Province Engineering Technology Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China.
Haoyang FuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, P.R. China.
Weiyi YangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, P.R. China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, P.R. China.
Yuping ZengDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, P.R. China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) seriously affects the quality of life of patients and increases the medical burden. The purpose of the present study was to determine the risk factors for rLDH after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for studies on the factors associated with rLDH after PELD. The databases were searched from inception to March 30, 2023. The combined effects of categorical variables and continuous variables were measured using odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), respectively, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. A total of 9 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 5,446 patients. This study explored a total of 18 potential risk factors for rLDH after PELD; ultimately, 5 factors were associated with the risk of rLDH. Meta-analysis showed that older age (WMD=6.49, 95% CI: 2.52 to 10.46), greater body mass index (WMD=1.16, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.62), modic change (OR=2.48, 95% CI: 1.54 to 3.99), Pfirrmann grade ≥4 (OR=2.84, 95% CI: 1.3 to 6.16) and greater sacral slope angle (WMD=3.48, 95% CI: 0.53 to 6.42) were risk factors for rLDH after PELD. The risk factors identified in the present study may enable clinicians to identify high-risk populations early and to select appropriate surgical procedures to reduce the risk of rLDH. Perioperative interventions targeting the modifiable factors identified in this study may be beneficial for reducing the risk of rLDH.

Indexed as

meta-analysispercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomyrecurrent lumbar disc herniationrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38544559
PMCPMC10966669
OpenAlexW4392658604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.