ReviewInflammatory intestinal diseases
The Impacts of Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Inflammatory intestinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical interventions in inflammatory bowel disease: Indications, techniques, outcomes, and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: an analysis of the Nationwide readmission database, 2016-2020.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Risk factors for early postoperative complications after minimally invasive surgery in pediatric ulcerative colitis.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Surgical trend including minimally invasive surgeries for ulcerative colitis in the COSUC study: the largest multicenter cohort study in Japan.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Oral antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with preventing surgical site infection following 2-stage restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) is now recognized as the standard procedure for colorectal surgery. However, the standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) is total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), which may be an overly complex procedure to complete laparoscopically. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy as well as the advantages and disadvantages of LAP-IPAA in patients with UC stratified by the outcome of interest. Method: We performed a systematic literature review by searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Centra Reuvo Medicina databases from inception until January 2023. Meta-analyses were performed for surgical outcomes, including morbidity and surgical course, to evaluate the efficacy of LAP-IPAA. Results: A total of 707 participants, including 341 LAP and 366 open surgery (OPEN) patients in 9 observational studies and one randomized controlled study, were included. From the results of the meta-analyses, the odds ratio (OR) of total complications in LAP was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.58-2.17, Conclusions: During IPAA for UC, a similar morbidity rate was seen for LAP and OPEN. Although LAP necessitates extended surgery, there may be certain advantages to this procedure, including easy visibility during the surgical procedure or a shortened time to oral intake after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.