ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Using unsupervised capsule neural network reveal spatial representations in the human brain.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroadaptive changes in brain structural-functional coupling among pilots.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Exploring the Relationship between Abnormal Communication Efficiency of Cerebral Cortex and Multiple Cognitive Functions in Mild Subcortical Stroke: A Resting-State fMRI Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Using unsupervised capsule neural network reveal spatial representations in the human brain.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Humans can extract high-level spatial features from visual signals, but spatial representations in the brain are complex and remain unclear. The unsupervised capsule neural network (U-CapsNet) is sensitive to the spatial location and relationship of the object, contains a special recurrent mechanism and uses a self-supervised generation strategy to represent images, which is similar to the computational principle in the human brain. Therefore, we hypothesized that U-CapsNet can help us understand how the human brain processes spatial information. First, brain activities were studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging during spatial working memory in which participants had to remember the locations of circles for a short time. Then, U-CapsNet served as a computational model of the brain to perform tasks that are identical to those performed by humans. Finally, the representational models were used to compare the U-CapsNet with the brain. The results showed that some human-defined spatial features naturally emerged in the latent space of U-CapsNet. Moreover, representations in U-CapsNet captured the response structure of two types of brain regions during different activity patterns, as well as important factors associated with human behavior. Together, our study not only provides a computationally feasible framework for modeling how the human brain encodes spatial features but also provides insights into the representational format and goals of the human brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.