ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2024
A probabilistic neural twin for treatment planning in peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital twins and digital models of the human circulatory system.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- On the accuracy of implicit neural representations for cardiovascular anatomies and hemodynamic fields.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- A scoping review of human digital twins in healthcare applications and usage patterns.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- svZeroDSolver: A modular package for lumped-parameter cardiovascular simulations.Journal of open source software · 2025Article
- Deforming Patient-Specific Models of Vascular Anatomies to Represent Stent Implantation via Extended Position Based Dynamics.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The substantial computational cost of high-fidelity models in numerical hemodynamics has, so far, relegated their use mainly to offline treatment planning. New breakthroughs in data-driven architectures and optimization techniques for fast surrogate modeling provide an exciting opportunity to overcome these limitations, enabling the use of such technology for time-critical decisions. We discuss an application to the repair of multiple stenosis in peripheral pulmonary artery disease through either transcatheter pulmonary artery rehabilitation or surgery, where it is of interest to achieve desired pressures and flows at specific locations in the pulmonary artery tree, while minimizing the risk for the patient. Since different degrees of success can be achieved in practice during treatment, we formulate the problem in probability, and solve it through a sample-based approach. We propose a new offline-online pipeline for probabilistic real-time treatment planning which combines offline assimilation of boundary conditions, model reduction, and training dataset generation with online estimation of marginal probabilities, possibly conditioned on the degree of augmentation observed in already repaired lesions. Moreover, we propose a new approach for the parametrization of arbitrarily shaped vascular repairs through iterative corrections of a zero-dimensional approximant. We demonstrate this pipeline for a diseased model of the pulmonary artery tree available through the Vascular Model Repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.