SynthesisJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Patients' Experience to MRI Examinations-A Systematic Qualitative Review With Meta-Synthesis.
Synthesis in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining the MRI Examination Experience: The Relationship Between Waiting Times, Information Provision, and Patient Anxiety.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Experience: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study with Implications for Nursing Preparation and Communication.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Review
- Feasibility and Tolerability of Performing Portable MRI for Neurological Disorders in an Outpatient Neurology Clinic: A Prospective Cohort.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Narrative Review of Clinical Management, Contemporary Innovations, And Global Challenges.International journal of medical science and dental health · 2026Article
- MRI-Related Claustrophobia: Patient-Reported Experience and Associated Factors in a Makkah Region Cohort.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Beyond the OR - challenges of MRI anesthesia in a complex oncologic patient: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Neural circuit mechanisms of epilepsy: Maintenance of homeostasis at the cellular, synaptic, and neurotransmitter levels.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Validation and benchmarking of Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) tool for the safety of patients undergoing MRI investigations.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- A single MRI scan contains sufficient imaging information for accurate prediction of meningioma growth risk.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Considering hounsfield units in native CT- scans for diagnosing spondylodiscitis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Software-Optimized Protocols for Acoustic Noise Reduction During Brain MRI at 7 Tesla.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Readability of patient education materials on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Correlations of Measurement Parameters among Modern Technologies for Sarcopenia Assessment.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Patient-centered modeling of the breast biopsy experience.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Metaverse-based cardiac magnetic resonance imaging simulation application for overcoming claustrophobia: a preliminary feasibility trial.Future cardiology · 2024Article
- Vision 2030 healthcare efficiency: Radiology no-shows at King Fahd Hospital of the University - Financial and operational burden.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients often mention distress, anxiety, or claustrophobia related to MRI, resulting in no-shows, disturbances of the workflow, and lasting psychological effects. Patients' experience varies and is moderated by socio-demographic aspects alongside the clinical condition. While qualitative studies help understand individuals' experiences, to date a systematic review and aggregation of MRI individuals' experience is lacking. PURPOSE: To investigate how adult patients experience MRI, and the characterizing factors. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review with meta-aggregation and meta-synthesis. POPULATION: 220 patients' reported experience of adults undergoing clinical MRI and 144 quotes from eight qualitative studies. ASSESSMENT: Systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. For quality appraisal, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools were used. Convergent segregated approach was undertaken. DATA ANALYSIS: Participant recruitment, setting of exploration, type of interview, and analysis extracted through Joana Briggs Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI QARI) tool. Meta-synthesis was supported by a concept map. For meta-aggregation, direct patient quotes were extracted, findings grouped, themes and characterizing factors at each stage abstracted, and categories coded in two cycles. Frequency of statements was quantified. Interviews' raw data unavailability impeded computer-aided analysis.
resultsEight articles out of 12,755 initial studies, 220 patients, were included. Meta-aggregation of 144 patient quotes answered: (1) experiences before, at the scanning table, during, and after an MRI, (2) differences based on clinical condition, and (3) characterizing factors, including coping strategies, look-and-feel of medical technology, interaction with professionals, and information. Seven publications lack participants' health literacy level, occupation, and eight studies lack developmental conditions, ethnicity, or country of origin. Six studies were conducted in university hospitals. DATA
conclusionAggregation of patients' quotes provide a foundational description of adult patients' MRI experience across the stages of an MRI process. Insufficient raw data of individual quotes and limited socio-demographic diversity may constrain the understanding of individual experience and characterizing factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.