Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544303›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2024

Psychosocial and economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic by sex among migrant populations compared with general Finnish population: a population-based study.

Sanna Nykänen, Regina García-Velázquez, Anu E Castaneda, Päivikki Koponen, Laura Musta, Natalia Skogberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanna NykänenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0006-4756-9335
Regina García-VelázquezDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1672-6557
Anu E CastanedaDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivikki KoponenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Laura MustaDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Natalia SkogbergDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo study sex differences in the psychosocial and economic impact of the restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 among the migrant origin and the general population in Finland.

methodsCross-sectional MigCOVID Survey data (10/2020-2/2021;

resultsThe migrant origin population had higher odds for reporting weakened economic situation (odds ratio (OR) 5.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.96-7.39), increased loneliness (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.35-2.28), decrease in feelings of hope for the future (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.33-2.19) and increased sleeping difficulties and nightmares (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.34-2.92) than the general population. While the psychosocial and economic impact of COVID-19 was higher in women compared with men in the general population, findings were not fully replicated in the migrant origin population.

conclusions

Indexed as

COVID-19Transients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSex FactorsYoung AdultCOVID-19economicMigrationpsychosocialwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID38544303
PMCPMC11067388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.