Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544149›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Analytical Analysis of Factors Affecting the Accuracy of a Dual-Heat Flux Core Body Temperature Sensor.

Jakub Żmigrodzki, Szymon Cygan, Jan Łusakowski, Patryk Lamprecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakub ŻmigrodzkiInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4107-0211
Szymon CyganInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-8616
Jan ŁusakowskiInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.
Patryk LamprechtHealthwear Sp. z o.o., 31-539 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-8474-5672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive core body temperature (CBT) measurements using temperature and heat-flux have become popular in health, sports, work safety, and general well-being applications. This research aimed to evaluate two commonly used sensor designs: those that combine heat flux and temperature sensors, and those with four temperature sensors. We used analytical methods, particularly uncertainty analysis calculus and Monte Carlo simulations, to analyse measurement accuracy, which depends on the accuracy of the temperature and flux sensors, mechanical construction parameters (such as heat transfer coefficient), ambient air temperature, and CBT values. The results show the relationship between the accuracy of each measurement method variant and various sensor parameters, indicating their suitability for different scenarios. All measurement variants showed unstable behaviour around the point where ambient temperature equals CBT. The ratio of the heat transfer coefficients of the dual-heat flux (DHF) sensor's channels impacts the CBT estimation uncertainty. An analysis of the individual components of uncertainty in CBT estimates reveals that the accuracy of temperature sensors significantly impacts the overall uncertainty of the CBT measurement. We also calculated the theoretical limits of measurement uncertainty, which varied depending on the method variant and could be as low as 0.05 °C.

Indexed as

core body temperaturedual heat-flux sensormeasurement accuracyMonte Carlo

Identifiers

PMID38544149
PMCPMC10974837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.