Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544130›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Optimization of 3D Passive Acoustic Mapping Image Metrics: Impact of Sensor Geometry and Beamforming Approach.

Sarah Therre, Marc Fournelle, Steffen Tretbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah TherreDepartment Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-7729
Marc FournelleDepartment Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0690-9384
Steffen TretbarDepartment Ultrasound, Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), 66280 Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-0825

Funding

Fraunhofer Internal Programs PREPARE 840232 THERANUS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping (PAM) with matrix arrays typically suffers from high demands on the receiving electronics and high computational load. In our study, we investigated, both numerically and experimentally, the influence of matrix array aperture size, element count, and beamforming approaches on defined image metrics. With a numerical Vokurka model, matrix array acquisitions of cavitation signals were simulated. In the experimental part, two 32 × 32 matrix arrays with different pitches and aperture sizes were used. After being reconstructed into 3D cavitation maps, defined metrics were calculated for a quantitative comparison of experimental and numerical data. The numerical results showed that the enlargement of the aperture from 5 to 40 mm resulted in an improvement of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) by factors of 6 and 13 (in lateral and axial dimension, respectively). A larger array sparsity influenced the point spread function (PSF) only slightly, while the grating lobe level (GLL) remained more than 12 dB below the main lobe. These results were successfully experimentally confirmed. To further reduce the GLL caused by array sparsity, we adapted a non-linear filter from optoacoustics for use in PAM. In combination with the delay, multiply, sum, and integrate (DMSAI) algorithm, the GLL was decreased by 20 dB for 64-element reconstructions, resulting in levels that were identical to the fully populated matrix reconstruction levels.

Indexed as

cavitation monitoringhigh-intensity focused ultrasoundpassive acoustic mappingultrasound therapy

Identifiers

PMID38544130
PMCPMC10974398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.