ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Optimization of 3D Passive Acoustic Mapping Image Metrics: Impact of Sensor Geometry and Beamforming Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Passive Cavitation Mapping (3D-PCM) with a Large-aperture Planar Array.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping of high intensity focused ultrasound fields using sparse synthetic apertures from rotated one-dimensional linear arrays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping (PAM) with matrix arrays typically suffers from high demands on the receiving electronics and high computational load. In our study, we investigated, both numerically and experimentally, the influence of matrix array aperture size, element count, and beamforming approaches on defined image metrics. With a numerical Vokurka model, matrix array acquisitions of cavitation signals were simulated. In the experimental part, two 32 × 32 matrix arrays with different pitches and aperture sizes were used. After being reconstructed into 3D cavitation maps, defined metrics were calculated for a quantitative comparison of experimental and numerical data. The numerical results showed that the enlargement of the aperture from 5 to 40 mm resulted in an improvement of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) by factors of 6 and 13 (in lateral and axial dimension, respectively). A larger array sparsity influenced the point spread function (PSF) only slightly, while the grating lobe level (GLL) remained more than 12 dB below the main lobe. These results were successfully experimentally confirmed. To further reduce the GLL caused by array sparsity, we adapted a non-linear filter from optoacoustics for use in PAM. In combination with the delay, multiply, sum, and integrate (DMSAI) algorithm, the GLL was decreased by 20 dB for 64-element reconstructions, resulting in levels that were identical to the fully populated matrix reconstruction levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.