ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Mechanism and Visual Vibration Signal Analysis for Bearing Fault Diagnosis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a Resilience-Oriented Framework for Fault Diagnosis Under Varying Operating Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An End-to-End Fault Diagnosis Model for Rolling Bearings Based on Multi-Scale Convolution and the Kolmogorov-Arnold Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hallucination-aware learning and latency optimization transformer (HALL-OPT) for real-time edge intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lightweight and precision dual track 1D and 2D feature fusion convolutional network for machinery equipment fault diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Semi-Supervised Informer for the Compound Fault Diagnosis of Industrial Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bearings, as widely employed supporting components, frequently work in challenging working conditions, leading to diverse fault types. Traditional methods for diagnosing bearing faults primarily center on time-frequency analysis, but this often requires expert experience for accurate fault identification. Conversely, intelligent fault recognition and classification methods frequently lack interpretability. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a convolutional neural network with an attention mechanism method, denoted as CBAM-CNN, for bearing fault diagnosis. This approach incorporates an attention mechanism, creating a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), to enhance the fault feature extraction capability of the network in the time-frequency domain. In addition, the proposed method integrates a weight visualization module known as the Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Map (Grad-CAM), enhancing the interpretability of the convolutional neural network by generating visual heatmaps on fault time-frequency graphs. The experimental results demonstrate that utilizing the dataset employed in this study, the CBAM-CNN achieves an accuracy of 99.81%, outperforming the Base-CNN with enhanced convergence speed. Furthermore, the analysis of attention weights reveals that this method exhibits distinct focus of attention under various fault types and degrees. The interpretability experiments indicate that the CBAM module balances the weight allocation, emphasizing signal frequency distribution rather than amplitude distribution. Consequently, this mitigates the impact of the signal amplitude on the diagnostic model to some extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.