Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38543984›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

How Approaching Angle, Bottleneck Width and Walking Speed Affect the Use of a Bottleneck by Individuals.

Ann Katrin Boomers, Maik Boltes, Uwe G Kersting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann Katrin BoomersInstitute for Advanced Simulation 7, Civil Safety Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3738-2869
Maik BoltesInstitute for Advanced Simulation 7, Civil Safety Research, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-896X
Uwe G KerstingNeuromechanics and Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2080

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 13N14533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding pedestrian dynamics at bottlenecks and how pedestrians interact with their environment-particularly how they use and move in the space available to them-is of safety importance, since bottlenecks are a key point for pedestrian flow. We performed a series of experiments in which participants walked through a bottleneck individually for varying combinations of approaching angle, bottleneck width and walking speed, to investigate the dependence of the movement on safety-relevant influencing factors. Trajectories as well as 3D motion data were recorded for every participant. This paper shows that (1) the maximum amplitude of shoulder rotation is mainly determined by the ratio of the bottleneck width to the shoulder width of the participant, while the direction is determined by the starting angle and the foot position; (2) the 'critical point' is not invariant to the starting angle and walking speed; (3) differences between the maximum and minimum speed values arise mainly from the distribution of deceleration patterns; and (4) the position of crossing shifts by 1.75 cm/10 cm, increasing the bottleneck width in the direction of origin.

Indexed as

PedestriansWalking SpeedAccidents, TrafficHumansMovementSafetyWalking3D motion capturingbottleneckbottleneck crossingpedestrian movementshoulder rotation

Identifiers

PMID38543984
PMCPMC10975616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.