ArticleVaccines2024
Long-Term Observation of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Response upon High Efficacy Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis-A Real-World Scenario.
Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- MS treatment trends before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the German MS Register.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Cellular and humoral vaccination response under immunotherapies-German consensus on vaccination strategies in neurological autoimmune diseases.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapy is needed in people with a chronic neuroinflammatory disease of the central nervous system such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, MS requires monitoring for and preventing against infectious diseases like SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination and anti-viral treatments are, in particular, recommended for elderly people and people at risk of a severe course of infection and of MS. Here, we asked whether repetitive infection or vaccination influenced responses upon receiving high efficacy treatments, namely sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator (S1P) or anti-CD20 B cell antibody (anti-CD20) treatments. We performed a prospective real-world study of people with MS (pwMS) under S1P or anti-CD20 with repetitive exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus or vaccine. The measurement of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres was performed by two independent immunoassays after initial immunisation and after booster vaccination or infection. Other laboratory and clinical parameters were included in the analysis of influencing factors. As secondary outcomes, lymphocyte and immunoglobulin levels were observed longitudinally under intravenous and subcutaneous anti-CD20 treatment. In a long-term real-world cohort of 201 pwMS, we found that despite lymphopenia upon S1P drugs, the SARS-CoV-2 immunisation response increased both in selective and non-selective S1P (100% and 88% seroconversion, respectively), whereas those under anti-CD20 therapies merely exhibited a slight long-term increase in antibody titres (52% seroconversion). The latter was independent of immunoglobulin or total lymphocyte levels, which mostly remained stable. If the individual was immunised prior to therapy initiation, their levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remained high under treatment. PwMS under non-selective S1P benefit from repetitive vaccination. The risk of an insufficient vaccination response mirrored by lower SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remains in pwMS receiving anti-CD20 treatment, even after repetitive exposure to the vaccine or virus. Due to the compromised vaccination response in CD20-depleting drugs, prompt antiviral treatment might be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.