ReviewVaccines2024
Pertussis Vaccines Scarcely Provide Protection against
Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Profile, Outcome and Risk Factors for Mortality Among Children Admitted with Critical Pertussis: An Ambispective Study.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Resurgence of pertussis: Epidemiological trends, contributing factors, challenges, and recommendations for vaccination and surveillance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- No innocent bystanders: pertussis vaccination and evolutionary parallelisms betweenMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPertussis, or whooping cough, is a global public health concern. Pertussis vaccines have demonstrated good protection against
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of pertussis vaccines in protecting children against
resultsThe meta-analysis, involving 46,533 participants, revealed no significant protective effect of pertussis vaccination against
conclusionsThese findings offer crucial insights into the lack of effectiveness of pertussis vaccines against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.