ArticleViruses2024
Predicting Natural Evolution in the RBD Region of the Spike Glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 by Machine Learning.
Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is a key focus in predicting protein mutations and aiding directed evolution. Research on potential virus variants is crucial for vaccine development. In this study, the machine learning software PyPEF was employed to conduct mutation analysis within the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the Spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Over 48,960,000 variants were predicted. Eight prospective variants that could surface in the future underwent modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. The study forecasts that the latest variant, ISOY2P5O1, may potentially emerge around 17 November 2023, with an approximate window of uncertainty of ±22 days. The ISOY8P5O2 variant displayed an increased binding capacity in the dry assay, with a total predicted binding energy of -110.306 kcal/mol. This represents an 8.25% enhancement in total binding energy compared to the original SARS-CoV-2 strain discovered in Wuhan (-101.892 kcal/mol). Reverse research confirmed the structural significance of mutation sites using ML models, particularly in the context of protein folding. The study validated regression methods (SVR, RF, and PLS) with different data structures. This study investigates the effectiveness of the "ML-Guided Design Correctly Predicts Combinatorial Effects Strategy" compared to the "ML-Guided Design Correctly Predicts Natural Evolution Prediction Strategy". To enhance machine learning, we created a timestamping algorithm and two auxiliary programs using advanced techniques to rapidly process extensive data, surpassing batch sequencing capabilities. This study not only advances machine learning in guiding protein evolution but also holds potential for forecasting future viruses and vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.