Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Virlanna Larissa Santos de AzevedoPostgraduate Department, Postgraduate Program in Bioscience Applied to Health, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.
Fernanda Costa RosaPostgraduate Department Postgraduate Program in Bionorte, Ceuma University, São Luís 65075-120, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-0869
Leo Ruben Lopes DiasPostgraduate Department, Postgraduate Program in Bioscience Applied to Health, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-4927
Lucas Abrantes BatistaPostgraduate Program in Parasitic Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil.
Mariana Costa MeloGraduate Department, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.
Luis Alfredo Torres SalesDepartment of Microbiology, PhD in Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-900, SP, Brazil.
Abia de Jesus Martins BrancoGraduate Department, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.
Thalison Rômulo Rocha AraújoGraduate Department, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Mendonça de MirandaPostgraduate Department, Postgraduate Program in Bioscience Applied to Health, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2116-1797
Amanda Silva Dos Santos AliançaPostgraduate Department, Postgraduate Program in Bioscience Applied to Health, Ceuma University, São Luis 65075-120, MA, Brazil.
Universidade Ceuma · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR
Funding
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão FAPEMA ACT-01787/21
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial, leishmanicidal, and cytotoxic potential of metabolites produced by bacteria isolated from rhizosphere soil samples. The bacterium was identified by genome sequencing as
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
An Evaluation of the Antibacterial, Antileishmanial, and Cytotoxic Potential of the Secondary Metabolites of · full record | OpenQuestion