Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38543332›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Experimental Global Warming Potential-Weighted Specific Stiffness Comparison among Different Natural and Synthetic Fibers in a Composite Component Manufactured by Tailored Fiber Placement.

Gustavo de Abreu Cáceres, Tales de Vargas Lisbôa, Cindy Elschner, Axel Spickenheuer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gustavo de Abreu CáceresLeibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8826-1613
Tales de Vargas LisbôaLeibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-6243
Cindy ElschnerLeibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2108-7040
Axel SpickenheuerLeibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V., 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-824X
Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research · DEUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aims to evaluate experimentally different fibers and resins in a topologically optimized composite component. The selected ones are made of carbon, glass, basalt, flax, hemp, and jute fibers. Tailored Fiber Placement (TFP) was used to manufacture the textile preforms, which were infused with two different epoxy resins: a partly biogenic and a fully petro-based one. The main objective is to evaluate and compare the absolute and specific mechanical performance of synthetic and natural fibers within a component framework as a base for improving assessments of sustainable endless-fiber reinforced composite material. Furthermore, manufacturing aspects regarding the different fibers are also considered in this work. In assessing the efficiency of the fiber-matrix systems, both the specific stiffness and the specific stiffness relative to carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq.) as measures for the global warming potential (GWP) are taken into account for comparison. The primary findings indicate that basalt and flax fibers outperform carbon fibers notably in terms of specific stiffness weighted by CO2eq.. Additionally, the selection of epoxy resin significantly influences the assessment of sustainable fiber-plastic composites.

Indexed as

carbon footprintmechanical performancenatural fiberstailored fiber placementtechnical natural fibers

Identifiers

PMID38543332
PMCPMC10974969
OpenAlexW4392552212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.