Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38543245›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Magnetic Floating Dosage Form by Alternating Current Biosusceptometry.

Gustavo Serafim Rodrigues, João Miguel Barboza, Laís Pereira Buranello, Vitor Melo Brandão, Priscileila Colerato Ferrari, Guilherme Augusto Soares, José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo Serafim RodriguesDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Miguel BarbozaDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-0257
Laís Pereira BuranelloDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor Melo BrandãoDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Priscileila Colerato FerrariDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ponta Grossa State University, Ponta Grossa 84030-900, Paraná, Brazil.
Guilherme Augusto SoaresDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4723-466X
José Ricardo de Arruda MirandaDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.657627/2021-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/1492.3-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/09829-4National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 308531/2021-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floating controlled systems seek to extend the gastric retention time (GRT) of solid pharmaceutical forms by sustaining buoyancy in the stomach without affecting gastric emptying rates. This investigation aimed to evaluate a magnetic floating drug delivery system (MFDDS) under diverse physiological conditions (pressure and viscosity) using an Alternating Current Biosusceptometry (ACB) system by conducting assessments in vitro and in vivo. For in vitro experiments, MFDDSs were placed under different pressures (760, 910, and 1060 mmHg) and viscosities (1, 50, 120, and 320 mPa·s) for evaluation of floating lag time (FLT). For in vivo experiments, eight healthy volunteers participated in two phases (fasting and fed) for gastric parameters (GRT, FLT, and OCTT-orocaecal transit time) assessment, employing the ACB system. The results indicated that pressure, viscosity, and FLT were directly proportional in the in vitro assay; in addition, increases in the OCTT (fasting = 241.9 ± 18.7; fed = 300 ± 46.4), GRT (fasting = 139.4 ± 25.3; fed = 190.2 ± 47.7), and FLT (fasting = 73.1 ± 16.9; fed = 107.5 ± 29.8) were detected in vivo. Our study emphasizes that the ACB system is a valuable technique, and it is capable of tracking and imaging MFDDS in in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Indexed as

ACB systemfloating lag time (FLT)intragastric pressuremagnetic floating drug delivery systemsviscosity

Identifiers

PMID38543245
PMCPMC10975272
OpenAlexW4392375309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.