ArticlePharmaceutics2024
Studying the API Distribution of Controlled Release Formulations Produced via Continuous Twin-Screw Wet Granulation: Influence of Matrix Former, Filler and Process Parameters.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Material-Process-Equipment Integrated Design Method for Accelerating the Process Development of Twin-Screw Wet Granulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Continuous Manufacturing of Controlled-Release Metoprolol Succinate Tablets by Novel Hot-Melt Fragmentation Technology.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is a preferred hydrophilic matrix former for controlled release formulations produced through continuous twin-screw wet granulation. However, a non-homogeneous API distribution over sieve fractions with underdosing in the fines fraction (<150 µm) was previously reported. This could result in content uniformity issues during downstream processing. Therefore, the current study investigated the root cause of the non-homogeneous theophylline distribution. The effect of process parameters (L/S-ratio and screw configuration) and formulation parameters (matrix former and filler type) on content uniformity was studied. Next, the influence of the formulation parameters on tableting and dissolution behavior was investigated. Altering the L/S-ratio or using a more aggressive screw configuration did not result in a homogeneous API distribution over the granule sieve fractions. Using microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as filler improved the API distribution due to its similar behavior as HPMC. As excluding HPMC or including a hydrophobic matrix former (Kollidon SR) yielded granules with a homogeneous API distribution, HPMC was identified as the root cause of the non-homogeneous API distribution. This was linked to its fast hydration and swelling (irrespective of the HPMC grade) upon addition of the granulation liquid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.