Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38542988›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Rational Design of Magnetic Nanoparticles as T

Carlos F G C Geraldes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Contrast Agents for Enhanced Bioimaging: A Comprehensive Review.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Carbon Dots Meet MRI: Metal Doping for a Smart Contrast Agent Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exosome tracking by magnetic resonance imaging.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carlos F G C GeraldesDepartment of Life Sciences and Coimbra Chemistry Center (CQC-IMS), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0837-8329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), either paramagnetic or superparamagnetic depending on their composition and size, have been thoroughly studied as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents using in vitro and in vivo biomedical preclinical studies, while some are clinically used. Their magnetic properties responsible in some cases for high magnetization values, together with large surface area-to-volume ratios and the possibility of surface functionalization, have been used in MRI-based diagnostic and theranostics applications. MNPs are usually used as positive (T

Indexed as

Lanthanoid Series ElementsMagnetite NanoparticlesContrast MediaGadoliniumMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaGadoliniumLanthanoid Series ElementsMagnetite Nanoparticlesbimodal contrast agentmagnetic nanoparticlemagnetic resonance imagingnegative contrastpositive contrast

Identifiers

PMID38542988
PMCPMC10974227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.