Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38542767›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Efficiency of the Vitamin D Status Diagnosticator amongst Geriatric Patients with COVID-19.

Caroline Charonnat, Dolores Sanchez-Rodriguez, Spyridon N Karras, Duygu Gezen-Ak, Erdinç Dursun, Cédric Annweiler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Caroline CharonnatDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity CeRAL, University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.
Dolores Sanchez-RodriguezRehabilitation Research Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-5172
Spyridon N KarrasLaboratory of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, Aristotle University, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-2746
Duygu Gezen-AkBrain and Neurodegenerative Disorders Research Laboratories, Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.
Erdinç DursunBrain and Neurodegenerative Disorders Research Laboratories, Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3701-6674
Cédric AnnweilerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity CeRAL, University Hospital, 49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7199-8109
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vitamin D status diagnosticator (VDSD), a 16-item tool, effectively identifies hypovitaminosis D in healthy older adults and can assist in determining the need for blood tests in this population. Assessing vitamin D levels is particularly crucial in the context of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the VDSD's effectiveness in pinpointing hypovitaminosis D in older adults affected by COVID-19. The research involved 102 unsupplemented geriatric inpatients consecutively admitted to the acute geriatric division of Angers University Hospital, France, with an average age of 85.0 ± 5.9 years (47.1% women). The physician-administered VDSD was conducted simultaneously with the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). Hypovitaminosis D was defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration of ≤75 nmol/L for vitamin D insufficiency and ≤50 nmol/L for vitamin D deficiency. Results revealed that 87 participants (85.3%) had vitamin D insufficiency and 63 (61.8%) had vitamin D deficiency. The VDSD accurately identified vitamin D deficiency with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an odds ratio (OR) of 40. However, its accuracy in identifying vitamin D insufficiency was lower (AUC = 0.57). In conclusion, the 16-item VDSD, a concise questionnaire, effectively identifies vitamin D deficiency in geriatric patients with COVID-19. This tool can be valuable in guiding the decision to administer vitamin D supplementation during the early stages of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vitamin D DeficiencyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsCOVID-19older adultsscreeningvitamin Dvitamin D deficiency

Identifiers

PMID38542767
PMCPMC10975055
OpenAlexW4392861988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.