ArticleMicromachines2024
Dimensional Fidelity and Orientation Effects of PolyJet Technology in 3D Printing of Negative Features for Microfluidic Applications.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication of an Anatomically Realistic Intestinal Phantom with Villous Microstructure.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Muscles: Electrostatic Actuation and Design Tradeoffs.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Does Aging Affect PolyJet™ 3D-Printed Teeth for Endodontics? A Micro-CT Evaluation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Does Printing Orientation Matter in PolyJet 3D Printed Teeth for Endodontics? A Micro-CT Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Review
- Experimental Proof of Principle of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Benthic Microbial Fuel Cells (MBMFCs) with Inbuilt Biocompatible Carbon-Fiber Electrodes.Micromachines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative features in microdevices find a wide range of applications. The process of 3D printing has revolutionized their fabrication due to the combination of good resolution and integration capability. Herein, we report on a systematic study of the effects of materials and print directions on the 3D printing of microfluidic channels as negative features under PolyJet technology. Specifically, the Statasys Objet500 printer was used for this study. We printed two sets of chips (n=10 each), each of which contains channel pairs of a high-contrast reference material and a sacrificial material, respectively. Both materials were embedded in a clear photopolymer resin. The channel pairs ranged in planned width from 64 to 992 μm. To explore the effect on print orientation, channels were printed either parallel or perpendicular with respect to the jetting head's movement. The width of each channel of a pair was compared for each planned width and each combination of materials. The effect of print orientation on channel morphology was also investigated. We found that reproducibility and accuracy were highest at a planned channel width of approximately ≥600 μm and that channel morphology was most suitable when the jetting head of the printer moved parallel to the channel's longitudinal axis. The results should be of interest to any users who wish to create negative features using PolyJet 3D technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.