ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
HFE Mutations in Neurodegenerative Disease as a Model of Hormesis.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Leukocyte Antigen and microRNAs as Key Orchestrators of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Convergent Astrocytic Failure in Parkinson's Disease: A System-Level Model of Pathogenesis and Treatment.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Collection Series "Iron Homeostasis".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Next Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients Affected by Parkinson's Disease and Correlation Between Genotype and Phenotype in Selected Clinical Cases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Investigating hormesis, aging, and neurodegeneration: From bench to clinics.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common variants in the iron regulatory protein HFE contribute to systematically increased iron levels, yet the effects in the brain are not fully characterized. It is commonly believed that iron dysregulation is a key contributor to neurodegenerative disease due to iron's ability to catalyze reactive oxygen species production. However, whether HFE variants exacerbate or protect against neurodegeneration has been heavily debated. Some claim that mutated HFE exacerbates oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, thus predisposing carriers to neurodegeneration-linked pathologies. However, H63D HFE has also been shown to slow the progression of multiple neurodegenerative diseases and to protect against environmental toxins that cause neurodegeneration. These conflicting results showcase the need to further understand the contribution of HFE variants to neurodegenerative disease heterogeneity. Data from mouse models consistently demonstrate robust neuroprotection against toxins known to increase the risk of neurodegenerative disease. This may represent an adaptive, or hormetic, response to increased iron, which leaves cells better protected against future stressors. This review describes the current research regarding the contribution of HFE variants to neurodegenerative disease prognosis in the context of a hormetic model. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a hormetic model for neurodegenerative disease has been presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.