ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SSR_VibraProfiler: a Python package for accurate classification of varieties using SSRs with intra-variety specificity and inter-variety polymorphism.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity Analysis and Fingerprint Construction for 87 Passionfruit (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Asymmetric Introgression and Cryptic Natural Hybridization between Two Species ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have become one of the most popular molecular markers and are used in numerous fields, including conservation genetics, population genetic studies, and genetic mapping. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology and the growing amount of genomic data are driving the development of bioinformatics tools for SSR marker design. These tools work with different combinations of input data, which can be raw reads or assemblies, and with one or more input datasets. We present here a new strategy and implementation of a simple standalone pipeline that utilizes more than one assembly for the in silico design of PCR primers for microsatellite loci in more than one species. Primers are tested in silico to determine if they are polymorphic, eliminating the need to test time-consuming cross-species amplification in the laboratory. The end result is a set of markers that are in silico polymorphic in all analyzed species and have great potential for the identification of interspecies hybrids. The efficiency of the tool is demonstrated using two examples at different taxonomic levels and with different numbers of input assemblies to generate promising, high-quality SSR markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.