Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541878›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Scoring Abdominal Symptoms in People with Cystic Fibrosis.

Harold Tabori, Anton Barucha, Carlos Zagoya, Franziska Duckstein, Gabor A Dunay, Pauline Sadrieh, Louise Polte, Jochen G Mainz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harold TaboriCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Anton BaruchaCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Carlos ZagoyaCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Franziska DucksteinCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Gabor A DunayFaculty of Health Sciences, Joint Faculty of the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-1505
Pauline SadriehCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Louise PolteCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Jochen G MainzCystic Fibrosis Centre, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) University, Klinikum Westbrandenburg, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3780-7759
University of Potsdam · DEUniversitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The introduction of highly effective CFTR-modulating therapies (HEMT) has changed the course of the disease for many people with Cystic Fibrosis (pwCF). Attention previously focused on life-threatening conditions of the respiratory system has broadened, bringing the involvement of the digestive system into the clinical and scientific focus. This emphasized the need for sensitive tools to capture and quantify changes in abdominal symptoms (AS), ideally applying patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). (2) Methods: The present review focuses on studies addressing AS assessment deriving from the multi-organic abdominal involvement in pwCF. Among 5224 publications retrieved until Nov. 2022, 88 were eligible, and 39 were finally included. (3) Results: The review reveals that for a long time, especially before HEMT availability, AS in pwCF were assessed by single questions on abdominal complaints or non-validated questionnaires. PROMs focusing on quality of life (QOL) including a few GI-related questions were applied. Likewise, PROMs developed and partially validated for other non-CF GI pathologies, such as chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, irritable bowel syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, or pancreatitis, were implemented. (4) Conclusions: Only lately, CF-specific GI-PROMs have been developed and validated following FDA guidelines, showing high sensitivity to changes and capturing marked and statistically significant reductions in the burden of AS achieved with HEMT implementation.

Indexed as

CFAbd-ScoreCFTRgastrointestinalmodulatorPAC-QOLPAC-SYMPAGI-SYMpatient-reported outcome measure (PROM)PedsQL-GI

Identifiers

PMID38541878
PMCPMC10971656
OpenAlexW4392745594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.