Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541844›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Evaluating GlicoPro Tear Substitute Derived from

Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez, José-María Sánchez-González, Giovanni Roberto Tedesco, Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada, Gianluca Murano, Antonio Spinelli, Cosimo Mazzotta, Davide Borroni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Hydroxypropyl-Methylcellulose and GlicoProOphthalmology and therapy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio Ballesteros-SánchezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-8685
José-María Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-7717
Giovanni Roberto TedescoStudio Oculistico Tedesco, 88025 Girifaldo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1350-3398
Carlos Rocha-de-LossadaQvision Ophthalmology Department, VITHAS Almeria Hospital, 04120 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-2493
Gianluca MuranoSacro Cuore-iGreco Ospedali Riuniti, 87100 Cosenza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-4053-7943
Antonio SpinelliBiomeeting, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Cosimo MazzottaSiena Crosslinking Center, 53035 Siena, Italy.
Davide BorroniDepartament of Ophthalmology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-6952-5647
Clínica Rementería · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESRiga Stradiņš University · LVUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Reggio Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

corneal esthesiometrydry eye diseaseHelix aspersaocular paintear substitute

Identifiers

PMID38541844
PMCPMC10971458
OpenAlexW4392696542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.