Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Susanne DeiningerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-6973
Anna Maria DieplingerInstitute for Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Wanda LauthTeam Biostatistics and Big Medical Data, IDA Lab Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 16, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas LusuardiDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5284-7276
Peter TörzsökDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-388X
David OswaldDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Maximilian PallaufDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Christian EibenDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Julia PetersDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Eva ErneDepartment of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-7625
Quirin ZanglDepartment of Neuroanesthesia, Christian Doppler Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7091-4279
Christian DeiningerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Christian RamesmayerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2426-724X
Paracelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Tübingen · DE
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Functional Outcome and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment Options for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) in Patients ≥ 75 Years of Age. · full record | OpenQuestion