Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541613›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Stem Cells and Bone Tissue Engineering.

Xueqin Gao, Joseph J Ruzbarsky, Jonathan E Layne, Xiang Xiao, Johnny Huard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Bone Tissue Engineering: From Biomaterials to Clinical Trials.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xueqin GaoLinda and Mitch Hart Center for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO 81657, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5833-1548
Joseph J RuzbarskyLinda and Mitch Hart Center for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO 81657, USA.
Jonathan E LayneLinda and Mitch Hart Center for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO 81657, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-0989
Xiang XiaoGlassell School of Art, The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX 77006, USA.
Johnny HuardLinda and Mitch Hart Center for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO 81657, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute · USMuseum of Fine Arts, Houston · USSteadman Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental bone defects that are caused by trauma, infection, tumor resection, or osteoporotic fractures present significant surgical treatment challenges. Host bone autograft is considered the gold standard for restoring function but comes with the cost of harvest site comorbidity. Allograft bone is a secondary option but has its own limitations in the incorporation with the host bone as well as its cost. Therefore, developing new bone tissue engineering strategies to treat bone defects is critically needed. In the past three decades, the use of stem cells that are delivered with different scaffolds or growth factors for bone tissue engineering has made tremendous progress. Many varieties of stem cells have been isolated from different tissues for use in bone tissue engineering. This review summarizes the progress in using different postnatal stem cells, including bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, muscle-derived stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, dental pulp stem cells/periodontal ligament stem cells, periosteum stem cells, umbilical cord-derived stem cells, peripheral blood stem cells, urine-derived stem cells, stem cells from apical papilla, and induced pluripotent stem cells, for bone tissue engineering and repair. This review also summarizes the progress using exosomes or extracellular vesicles that are delivered with various scaffolds for bone repair. The advantages and disadvantages of each type of stem cell are also discussed and explained in detail. It is hoped that in the future, these preclinical results will translate into new regenerative therapies for bone defect repair.

Indexed as

adipose-derived stem cellsbone marrow mesenchymal stem cellsbone morphogenetic proteinsbone tissue engineeringdental pulp stem cellsexosomeextracellular vesiclesmicroRNAmuscle-derived stem cellsperiodontal ligament stem cellsperiosteum stem cellsperipheral blood stem cellsumbilical cord-derived stem cellsurine-derived stem cells

Identifiers

PMID38541613
PMCPMC10971350
OpenAlexW4391995772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.