ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Simultaneous Pore Detection and Morphological Features Extraction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion with Image Processing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Source Porosity Image Normalization (NMI) in Selective Laser Melting for Reliable Reuse of Heterogeneous Microstructural Data.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internal pore defects are inevitable during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), which have a significant impact on the mechanical properties of the parts. Therefore, detecting pores and obtaining their morphology will contribute to the quality of LPBF parts. Currently, supervised models are used for defect image detection, which requires a large amount of LPBF sample data, image labeling, and computing power equipment during the training process, resulting in high detection costs. This study extensively collected LPBF sample data and proposed a method for pore defect classification by obtaining its morphological features while detecting pore defects in optical microscopy (OM) images under various conditions. Compared with other advanced models, the proposed method achieves better detection accuracy on pore defect datasets with limited data. In addition, quickly detecting pore defects in a large number of labeling ground truth images will also contribute to the development of deep learning. In terms of image segmentation, the average accuracy scores of this method in the test images exceed 85%. The research results indicate that the algorithm proposed in this paper is suitable for quickly and accurately identifying pore defects from optical microscopy images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.