Preparation of Ce-Doped Gd

Min Liu, Yansen Zhang, Song Hu, Guohong Zhou, Xianpeng Qin, Shiwei Wang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Ultra-dense lutetium oxide ceramic scintillators for positron emission tomography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min LiuSchool of Materials Science & Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.

Yansen ZhangSchool of Materials Science & Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.ORCID 0009-0006-0152-1598

Song HuShanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6750-6992

Guohong ZhouShanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China.

Xianpeng QinShanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-1100

Shiwei WangShanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ce-doped gadolinium gallium aluminum oxide (Ce: GGAG) precursors were first prepared by the microwave-assisted homogeneous precipitation method (MAHP). Thermal gravity-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), specific surface area analysis (BET) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) were employed to investigate the crystal structure, phase evolution and morphologies of the Ce: GGAG precursors and powders. The influence of Ga ion concentration in the salt solution on the properties of Ce: GGAG powders was investigated. All the precursors were transformed into single-phase GGAG after being calcined at 950 °C in a furnace for 3 h. Monodispersed Ce: GGAG powders were obtained as the Ga ion concentration was lower than 0.06 mol/L. Single-phase and dense Ce: GGAG ceramics were obtained after sintering at 1600 °C in a flowing oxygen atmosphere for 10 h. Specifically, the Ce: GGAG ceramic reached its maximum density of ~6.68 g/cm

Indexed as

Ce: GGAGmicrowave-assisted homogenization precipitationscintillationtransparent ceramic

Identifiers

PMID38541411

DOI10.3390/ma17061258

PMCPMC10971854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.