Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541361›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Trends and Patterns in Electronic Health Record Research (1991-2022): A Bibliometric Analysis of Australian Literature.

Hongmei Xie, Andreas Cebulla, Peivand Bastani, Madhan Balasubramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongmei XieCollege of Business Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Andreas CebullaAustralian Industrial Transformation Institute, College of Business Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-6245
Peivand BastaniCollege of Business Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Madhan BalasubramanianCollege of Business Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2798-5850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Heath Records (EHRs) play vital roles in facilitating streamlined service provision and governance across the Australian health system. Given the recent challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, an ageing population, health workforce silos, and growing inefficiencies in traditional systems, a detailed historical analysis of the use of EHR research in Australia is necessary. The aim of this study is to examine the trends and patterns in EHR research in Australia over the past three decades by employing bibliometric methods. A total of 951 articles published in 443 sources were included in the bibliometric analysis. The annual growth rate of EHR research in Australia was about 17.1%. Since 2022, the main trending topics in EHR research were COVID-19, opioid usage, and natural language processing. A thematic analysis indicated aged care, clinical decision support systems, cardiovascular disease, drug allergy, and adverse drug reaction as the "hot" themes in EHR research in Australia. This study reveals a significant uptrend in EHR research in Australia, highlighting the evolving intellectual and collaborative landscape of this interdisciplinary field. The data also provide guidance for policymakers and funding institutions in terms of the most significant contributions and key fields of research while also holding public interest.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPandemicsAgedAustraliaBibliometricsHumansPublicationsAustraliabibliometric analysiselectronic health recordelectronic medical record

Identifiers

PMID38541361
PMCPMC10970652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.