Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541319›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Women's Health Information-Seeking Experiences and Preferences for Health Communications on FDA-Regulated Products: A Qualitative Study in Urban Area.

Moaz Abdelwadoud, Jennifer Huang, Ester Villalonga-Olives, Susan dosReis, Liz Jansky, C Daniel Mullins, Marc Kusinitz, Heather Ovelmen, Julia Ju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Moaz AbdelwadoudDepartment of Global and Environmental Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9716-5140
Jennifer HuangWestat, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Ester Villalonga-OlivesDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7418-4365
Susan dosReisDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Liz JanskyWestat, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
C Daniel MullinsDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4322-2490
Marc KusinitzUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Heather OvelmenNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Julia JuUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USWestat (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · US

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD005946United States Food and Drug Administration U01FD005946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key part of any effort to ensure informed health care decision-making among the public is access to reliable and relevant health-related information. We conducted focus groups with women from three generations across the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area to explore their information-seeking motivations, perceptions, challenges, and preferences regarding three FDA-regulated products: drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. The youngest generation discussed seeking health information for their children; the other two sought information for their own needs. All participants noted that finding health information appropriate to their reading level was a challenge, as was identifying reliable sources of information. All generations identified in-person and live interactions as their preferred method of communication and health care providers as their preferred source for information. All three generations recognized the usefulness of websites, and the two older generations acknowledged the advantages of brochures. Our findings suggest approaches the FDA could consider to improve communications: (a) supporting in-person and live health information interactions; (b) leveraging the agency's standing with the public to highlight it as a leading source of validated health information; (c) increasing the FDA website's visibility in internet searches and making its navigation easier; and (d) using multi-pronged approaches and media for various audiences.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationInformation Seeking BehaviorChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchWomen's Healthagingconsumer health informationFDAhealth communicationUnited States Food and Drug Administrationwomen

Identifiers

PMID38541319
PMCPMC10970415
OpenAlexW4392653968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.