Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541294›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

A Co-Created Tool to Help Counter Health Misinformation for Spanish-Speaking Communities in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Lucía Abascal Miguel, Andres Maiorana, Gustavo Santa Roza Saggese, Chadwick K Campbell, Beth Bourdeau, Emily A Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bridging community-engaged research and implementation science methods to advance public health practice.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucía Abascal MiguelInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Andres MaioranaDivision of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Gustavo Santa Roza SaggeseSanta Casa School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo 01221-020, Brazil.
Chadwick K CampbellHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health & Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-5762
Beth BourdeauDivision of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-6350
Emily A ArnoldDivision of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-9100

Funding

CDC HHS PRC VCNNCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth misinformation, which was particularly prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, hampers public health initiatives. Spanish-speaking communities in the San Francisco Bay Area may be especially affected due to low digital health literacy and skepticism towards science and healthcare experts. Our study aims to develop a checklist to counter misinformation, grounded in community insights.

methodsWe adopted a multistage approach to understanding barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Spanish-speaking populations in Alameda and San Francisco counties. Initial work included key informant and community interviews. Partnering with a community-based organization (CBO), we organized co-design workshops in July 2022 to develop a practical tool for identifying misinformation. Template analysis identified key themes for actionable steps, such as source evaluation and content assessment. From this, we developed a Spanish-language checklist.

findingsDuring formative interviews, misinformation was identified as a major obstacle to vaccine uptake. Three co-design workshops with 15 Spanish-speaking women resulted in a 10-step checklist for tackling health misinformation. Participants highlighted the need for scrutinizing sources and assessing messenger credibility, and cues in visual content that could instill fear. The checklist offers a pragmatic approach to source verification and information assessment, supplemented by resources from local CBOs.

conclusionWe have co-created a targeted checklist for Spanish-speaking communities to identify and counter health misinformation. Such specialized tools are essential for populations that are more susceptible to misinformation, enabling them to differentiate between credible and non-credible information.

Indexed as

LanguagePandemicsCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansSan FranciscoCOVID-19 Vaccinesco-design workshopscommunity-based organization (CBO)COVID-19 vaccinedigital health literacyhealth misinformationSpanish-speaking communities

Identifiers

PMID38541294
PMCPMC10970482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.