Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38541262›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Using Wash'Em to Design Handwashing Programmes for Crisis-Affected Populations in Zimbabwe: A Process Evaluation.

Astrid Hasund Thorseth, Jennifer Lamb, Constancia Vimbayi Mavodza, Mandikudza Tembo, Anesu Petra Mushangari, Eddington Zinyandu, Thomas Heath, Sian White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Astrid Hasund ThorsethLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jennifer LambLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Constancia Vimbayi MavodzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Mandikudza TemboLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Anesu Petra MushangariAction contre la Faim, 21 Giraffe Crescent, Borrowdale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Eddington ZinyanduAction contre la Faim, 21 Giraffe Crescent, Borrowdale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Thomas HeathAction contre la Faim, 102 rue de Paris, CS 10007, CEDEX, 93558 Montreuil, France.
Sian WhiteLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBPractical Action · ZWAction Contre la Faim · FRBiomedical Research and Training Institute · ZW

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-ODA-G-16-00270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wash'Em is a process that supports humanitarians in assessing and designing rapid but context-specific hygiene programmes in crises or outbreaks. The process consists of training implementers, using tools to learn from populations, and entering findings into a software which generates contextualised activities. A process evaluation of Wash'Em use was conducted in a drought-affected area in Midland province, Zimbabwe. Data were collected during the programme design and following implementation using a mix of qualitative methods. Findings were classified against the intended stages of Wash'Em, and the evaluation domains were defined by the UKRI Medical Research Council. The Wash'Em process was not fully implemented as intended. An abridged training was utilised, some of the tools for learning from populations were omitted, many of the recommended activities were not implemented, the delivery modalities were different from intended, the budget available was minimal, and the number of people exposed to activities were fewer than hoped. Despite these 'on the ground' challenges and adaptations, the Wash'Em process was considered feasible by implementers and was seen to be less top-down than most programme design approaches. The populations exposed to the intervention found the activities engaging, understood the content, and reportedly took action to improve handwashing behaviour. Programmes such as Wash'Em, which facilitate community participation and are underpinned by theory and evidence, are likely to yield positive results even if processes are followed imperfectly.

Indexed as

Hand DisinfectionHygieneDisease OutbreaksHumansProgram EvaluationZimbabwebehaviour changehandwashinghumanitarian criseshygieneprocess evaluationprogramme design

Identifiers

PMID38541262
PMCPMC10970461
OpenAlexW4392097242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.